Consider
how we experienced Reform Judaism in 1980, 1970, 1960, 1950. Consider
how we experience Reform Judaism today. What does that comparison
tell us about what will be the nature of the Reform Jewish experience
in 2010 or 2020 and beyond? It tells us a lot.
Let
me begin with a ritual review. In 1950 very little Hebrew found its
way into the service. Choirs gave performances as congregants sat
passively and listened. We were to be uplifted by the complex harmonies
and grandeur of their music. If any kipot or tallitot
appeared they did so only on the heads and shoulders of rabbis and
cantors and perhaps b’nei mitzvah boys. Few synagogues gave
daughters the right to have a bat mitzvah. Girls did not participate
in ritual as did boys, nor did women participate in leading the congregation
as did men. Daily services were a feature of Orthodox and Conservative
synagogue life. We did not want or welcome such practices. We remained
very aware of how near or far we were in our religious habits from
those with whom we sought to create some distance.
We
were modern advocates of a religion of reason. We came from dorfs
and sthetls and ruler-wielding Hebrew teachers. We left
behind long services using words no one understood, featuring all
sorts of physical moves with which we were not comfortable, and conducted
in a setting of noise and seeming bedlam that lacked any appropriate
regard for esthetics and meaning. We sought propriety and understanding,
and we turned our gaze to the future believing it best not to look
backwards from where we had already come.
As
Reform Jews we advocated strongly for social justice and the creation
of good interfaith relations. We did not wear our Judaism on our heads
or between our eyes and many did not even show their identities on
the doorposts of their homes. We were Jewish Americans, and we wanted
to define what that meant and hold onto it. It made us comfortable
and happy. It was fulfilling.
Is
it not right for the practitioners of a faith to be happy and comfortable
and fulfilled and inspired and well instructed in that faith and in
the institutions in which that faith is practiced? Of course it is.
It is right and good for the members of a Reform synagogue to be at
home there, to be uplifted by the experience of one’s faith in one’s
place of worship-one’s place of study and assembly. It is right.
It is good. It is necessary. That was true in 1950. It is true today.
It will be so in 2050. Over the decades however, the content of what
makes us happy, comfortable, fulfilled and inspired as Reform Jews
has changed.
Let
me digress for a moment. When a couple comes to me to discuss getting
ready for marriage, one of the assignments is for that couple to study
material from a history book titled The Lifetime of a Jew by
Hayyim Schauss. I tell them to focus on the ninety pages from the
chapters subtitled "Courtship and Marriage." I explain that
the purpose of examining this history is not so that they will model
their ceremony on the wedding plan enjoyed by Jews from the seventh
century BCE in Jerusalem, or from the second century Jewish community
of Babylonia, or from tenth century Germany, or from 18th century
Poland. I tell them that whatever decisions they are about to make
pertaining to the words and rituals that will comprise their marriage
service must be based on knowledge and understanding of the Jewish
past and present. Reform Jews do not make decisions about the conduct
of their faith ignorant of how that faith has been lived from ancient
days to the present.
If
today’s brides and grooms are planning to give each other rings and
if they plan for each to say to the other the very same words of commitment,
they first need to understand how doing so evolved from a very different
approach to marriage that developed in the Biblical period. The groom
from those days would view an egalitarian ceremony in which bride
and groom exchanged rings as having nothing to do with Jewish custom
as he knew it. Three thousand years ago it was usual for a man to
hand a woman, in front of witnesses, a coin worth at least one perutah
(like a dollar). When she accepted the item, she was indicating that
she accepted him as her husband. Centuries later the groom presented
the bride with a ring rather than a coin. Later still a formula of
commitment, spoken to the bride by the groom, entered the ceremony.
Centuries later the bride gave a ring to the groom. And in our own
time the bride does the very same things as the groom and says the
very same words to him that he says to her. A native of seventh century
BCE Jerusalem viewing a modern Reform Jewish wedding would not understand
the link to the customs with which he was familiar. He would call
it what we do todayun-Jewish. Nothing could be further
from the truth.
I
tell couples that the reason I want them to study the contents of
this material on the history of Jewish wedding ceremonies is to grasp
what a traditionally linked yet dynamic, evolving faith and way of
life Judaism is. There is no such thing as the one Jewish ceremony
that was done from Biblical days to the present. It evolved. I want
them to grasp this reality fully. It is liberating to do so. But they
also see that everything we do today emerged from what went before.
We are called to act with reverence toward such awareness.
They
must see that Judaism, including Reform Judaism, has always changed.
The ability to do so is its genius. It has enabled us to continue
while other groups long ago faded from the scene. Judaism continues
to evolve as it meets the requirements of the people Israel. It adjusts
to varieties in cultural experiences and historical pressures. That
is how it should be, especially within the Reform world.
Reform
Judaism was created with flexibility in mind. It preferred and sought
it, made its very essence the preparedness to blend traditional practice
with modern discoveries and sensibilities. It has done so in order
to find the right path to Jewish expression. Right is not staying
in the ancient past. Right is not abandoning the ancient past for
some creative present and future detached from where we have been.
Right means examining the Jewish past and present, and taking a serious,
very deep look at ourselves, combining the two results and seeing
where we emerged. What we did would have to be true and meaningful.
What we did would have to be filled to overflowing with integrity
and substance and purpose.
Reform
Judaism was not constructed to be easy. It was constructed to be demanding
and truthful and meaningful. As the wedding ceremony evolved, so would
the rest of our worship experience and our religious practices and
emphases. We are a tradition based, yet changing faith and people.
It
is said that a lot of newcomers, with traditional leanings migrating
into Reform, grew up in Conservative Judaism. That is certainly different
from the original generation of Reform Jews. They came from Orthodox
backgrounds. Is it not intuitively correct to say that anyone who
is a member in good standing in a Reform congregation has as much
right as anyone else to voice one’s opinion regarding what our practices
will be? Is that not intuitively right and proper?
Does
this love of tradition mostly come from Conservative reared newcomers
to Reform? I do not think so. I can tell you, as one who has served
Reform Judaism as a congregational rabbi for the past 25 years that
children raised Reform are just as likely or even more likely to push
for more traditional practices in their synagogues as are folks who
recently left the more traditional settings to join Reform.
Thousands
upon thousands of born and bred Reform Jews not only seek but they
demand great familiarity with the power and the majesty and the depth
of feeling and use of the symbols of their faith. They are not rooted
as much in the Reform Jewish practices with which they were raised
as they are rooted in Judaism and being Jewish. They know nothing
of the reluctance to show who and what they are that inhibited earlier
generations of American Reform Jews. They are not so much Jewish Americans
as they are American Jews. They want their Judaism to make demands
on them and to make them feel good and to connect them with their
past and support them as they struggle with all the vicissitudes of
existence to find their path to their future.
What
we have witnessed over the past fifty years is not the abandonment
of Reform Judaism, but its ongoing realization. It is flexible. It
is evolving. It is meant to meet the requirements of its practitioners
and is adapting accordingly.
That
is why the use of Hebrew increases and will continue to increase.
The Reform service 25 or 30 years from now will be overwhelmingly
recited in Hebrew. By that time lots more worshippers will indeed
know well what they are saying without benefit of an English translation
on the page. Hebrew study will intensify among us and take hold as
never before in the liberal ranks of Judaism. In addition, I believe
that Reform synagogues will begin to establish kosher kitchens. And
when it comes to conversion, all folks seeking to join our faith will
decide to immerse themselves in the mikveh as part of the conversion
rites. Someday, some larger Reform synagogues may install their own
mikvaot. It is clear that, as time goes on, more and more Reform
Jewish youth will attend day schools, and do so eagerly.
Let
me emphasize that the family education programming toward which Reform
religious schools now gravitate will enhance the participation of
the Reform Jewish family in Jewish life as never before. Parents will
move from planning most of their lives around secular endeavors and
leaving the leftovers for Jewish experiences to planning secular lives
around our Jewish needs. That is because morally, emotionally, spiritually,
rituallywe will discover how much it matters to do so.
We
will be smart enough and able enough to find the way to have our careers
move ahead while also paying more and more attention to Judaism. With
ever greater frequency we will inform our business and professional
decisions with an awareness of Jewish values. The secular realm will
shrink and nearly disappear as we become more complete Jews.
We
will not lose our commitments to egalitarianism and creativity and
embracing the truths that science and technology bring to our attention.
We will embrace them. We will be thoroughly modern and simultaneously
be thoroughly aware of tradition. We shall make ourselves competent
to adapt tradition so that we might become thoroughly fulfilled, modern
American Jews.
When
it comes to eating habits, my sense is that vegetarianism will become
a traditionally Jewish practice for many Reform Jews. Vegetarianism
will have greater appeal than merely refraining from consuming pork
products or shellfish.
Reform
will remain flexible and it will continue to evolve, as it has done
since its founding in Germany in 1810. People from that period looking
at Reform Judaism in 2001 or 10 or 20 might be moved to say, as the
biblical Jew would say of the double ring, egalitarian weddings of
today: That is not our Judaism. That is not what we do. But it is.
What
they will see as they look ahead will differ greatly from what they
know. But the underlying principles and purposes will remain the same.
A system that evolves to meet the needs of each generation cannot
stand still. We were not created to stand still. That is not the good.
The good is enhancing Jewish life and experience for Jews. The good
is to use our faith to improve and redeem the world in which we live
so that we and the rest of humanity will be strengthened and be well
served and move toward wholeness.
More
tradition will enter Reform Jewish rites in the decades to come. More
Hebrew will be used. More creativity will arise as well and the two,
tradition and creativity, will be well blended as Reform Judaism meets
its future. Come along. It will be a most delightful ride. Participate
and share in bringing about the future. Don’t leave it to others.
Be a part of making these determinations and revel in doing so.
May
we go from strength to ever greater strength. Kein yhi ratson.
So may it be.
Amen.